1. Flag Evaluation API
Overview
The evaluation API
allows for the evaluation of feature flag values, independent of any flag control plane or vendor. In the absence of a provider the evaluation API
uses the "No-op provider", which simply returns the supplied default flag value.
1.1. API Initialization and Configuration
Requirement 1.1.1
The
API
, and any state it maintains SHOULD exist as a global singleton, even in cases wherein multiple versions of theAPI
are present at runtime.
It's important that multiple instances of the API
not be active, so that state stored therein, such as the registered provider
, static global evaluation context
, and globally configured hooks
allow the API
to behave predictably. This can be difficult in some runtimes or languages, but implementors should make their best effort to ensure that only a single instance of the API
is used.
Setting a provider
Requirement 1.1.2.1
The
API
MUST define aprovider mutator
, a function to set the defaultprovider
, which accepts an API-conformantprovider
implementation.
// example provider mutator
OpenFeature.setProvider(new MyProvider());
The example above sets the default provider. This provider is used if a client is not bound to a specific provider via a domain.
See provider, creating clients for details.
Requirement 1.1.2.2
The
provider mutator
function MUST invoke theinitialize
function on the newly registered provider before using it to resolve flag values.
Application authors can await the newly set provider's
readiness using the PROVIDER_READY
event.
Provider instances which are already active (because they have been bound to another domain
or otherwise) need not be initialized again.
The provider's
readiness can state can be determined from its status
member/accessor.
See event handlers and initialization, provider initialization, domain for details.
Requirement 1.1.2.3
The
provider mutator
function MUST invoke theshutdown
function on the previously registered provider once it's no longer being used to resolve flag values.
When a provider is no longer in use, it should be disposed of using its shutdown
mechanism.
Provider instances which are bound to multiple domains
won't be shut down until the last binding is removed.
see shutdown, setting a provider, domain for details.
Requirement 1.1.2.4
The
API
SHOULD provide functions to set a provider and wait for theinitialize
function to complete or abnormally terminate.
This function not only sets the provider, but ensures that the provider is ready (or in error) before returning or settling.
// default provider
OpenFeatureAPI.getInstance().setProviderAndWait(myprovider); // this method blocks until the provider is ready or in error
// client uses the default provider
Client client = OpenFeatureAPI.getInstance().getClient();
// provider associated with domain-1
OpenFeatureAPI.getInstance().setProviderAndWait('domain-1', myprovider); // this method blocks until the provider is ready or in error
// client uses provider associated with the domain named 'domain-1'
Client client = OpenFeatureAPI.getInstance().getClient('domain-1');
Though it's possible to use events to await provider readiness, such functions can make things simpler for application authors
and integrators
.
Implementations indicate an error in a manner idiomatic to the language in use (returning an error, throwing an exception, etc).
Requirement 1.1.3
The
API
MUST provide a function to bind a givenprovider
to one or more clients using adomain
. If the domain already has a bound provider, it is overwritten with the new mapping.
OpenFeature.setProvider("domain-1", new MyProvider());
Clients can be associated with a particular provider by supplying a matching domain
when the provider is set.
See creating clients, domain for details.
Requirement 1.1.4
The
API
MUST provide a function to addhooks
which accepts one or more API-conformanthooks
, and appends them to the collection of any previously added hooks. When new hooks are added, previously added hooks are not removed.
// example hook attachment
OpenFeature.addHooks([new MyHook()]);
See hooks for details.
Requirement 1.1.5
The
API
MUST provide a function for retrieving the metadata field of the configuredprovider
.
// example provider accessor
OpenFeature.getProviderMetadata();
It's possible to access provider metadata using a domain
.
If a provider has not be registered under the requested domain, the default provider metadata is returned.
// example provider accessor
OpenFeature.getProviderMetadata("domain-1");
See provider, domain for details.
Creating clients
Requirement 1.1.6
The
API
MUST provide a function for creating aclient
which accepts the following options:
- domain (optional): A logical string identifier for binding clients to provider.
// example client creation and retrieval
OpenFeature.getClient();
It's possible to create a client that is associated with a domain
.
The client will use a provider in the same domain
if one exists, otherwise, the default provide is used.
// example client creation and retrieval using a domain
OpenFeature.getClient("domain-1");
See setting a provider, domain for details.
Requirement 1.1.7
The client creation function MUST NOT throw, or otherwise abnormally terminate.
Clients may be created in critical code paths, and even per-request in server-side HTTP contexts. Therefore, in keeping with the principle that OpenFeature should never cause abnormal execution of the first party application, this function should never throw. Abnormal execution in initialization should instead occur during provider registration.
1.2. Client Usage
Requirement 1.2.1
The client MUST provide a method to add
hooks
which accepts one or more API-conformanthooks
, and appends them to the collection of any previously added hooks. When new hooks are added, previously added hooks are not removed.
// example hook attachment
client.addHooks([new MyHook()]);
See hooks for details.
Requirement 1.2.2
The client interface MUST define a
metadata
member or accessor, containing an immutabledomain
field or accessor of type string, which corresponds to thedomain
value supplied during client creation.
client.getMetadata().getDomain(); // "domain-1"
In previous drafts, this property was called name
.
For backwards compatibility, implementations should consider name
an alias to domain
.
1.3. Flag Evaluation
Condition 1.3.1
The implementation uses the dynamic-context paradigm.
Conditional Requirement 1.3.1.1
The
client
MUST provide methods for typed flag evaluation, including boolean, numeric, string, and structure, with parametersflag key
(string, required),default value
(boolean | number | string | structure, required),evaluation context
(optional), andevaluation options
(optional), which returns the flag value.
// example boolean flag evaluation
boolean myBool = client.getBooleanValue('bool-flag', false);
// example overloaded string flag evaluation with optional params
string myString = client.getStringValue('string-flag', 'N/A', evaluationContext, options);
// example number flag evaluation
number myNumber = client.getNumberValue('number-flag', 75);
// example overloaded structure flag evaluation with optional params
MyStruct myStruct = client.getObjectValue<MyStruct>('structured-flag', { text: 'N/A', percentage: 75 }, evaluationContext, options);
See evaluation context for details.
Condition 1.3.2
The implementation uses the static-context paradigm.
Conditional Requirement 1.3.2.1
The
client
MUST provide methods for typed flag evaluation, including boolean, numeric, string, and structure, with parametersflag key
(string, required),default value
(boolean | number | string | structure, required), andevaluation options
(optional), which returns the flag value.
// example boolean flag evaluation
boolean myBool = client.getBooleanValue('bool-flag', false);
// example overloaded string flag evaluation with optional params
string myString = client.getStringValue('string-flag', 'N/A', options);
// example number flag evaluation
number myNumber = client.getNumberValue('number-flag', 75);
// example overloaded structure flag evaluation with optional params
MyStruct myStruct = client.getObjectValue<MyStruct>('structured-flag', { text: 'N/A', percentage: 75 }, options);
Condition 1.3.3
The implementation language differentiates between floating-point numbers and integers.
Conditional Requirement 1.3.3.1
The client SHOULD provide functions for floating-point numbers and integers, consistent with language idioms.
int getIntValue(String flag, int defaultValue);
long getFloatValue(String flag, long defaultValue);
See types for details.
Requirement 1.3.4
The
client
SHOULD guarantee the returned value of any typed flag evaluation method is of the expected type. If the value returned by the underlying provider implementation does not match the expected type, it's to be considered abnormal execution, and the supplieddefault value
should be returned.
1.4. Detailed Flag Evaluation
The detailed evaluation functions behave similarly to the standard flag evaluation functions, but provide additional metadata useful for telemetry, troubleshooting, debugging, and advanced integrations.
Note
Metadata included in the evaluation details
should be considered "best effort", since not all providers will be able to provide these details (such as the reason a flag resolved to a particular value).
see: evaluation details type
Condition 1.4.1
The implementation uses the dynamic-context paradigm.
Conditional Requirement 1.4.1.1
The
client
MUST provide methods for detailed flag value evaluation with parametersflag key
(string, required),default value
(boolean | number | string | structure, required),evaluation context
(optional), andevaluation options
(optional), which returns anevaluation details
structure.
// example detailed boolean flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<boolean> myBoolDetails = client.getBooleanDetails('bool-flag', false);
// example detailed string flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<string> myStringDetails = client.getStringDetails('string-flag', 'N/A', evaluationContext, options);
// example detailed number flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<number> myNumberDetails = client.getNumberDetails('number-flag', 75);
// example detailed structure flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<MyStruct> myStructDetails = client.getObjectDetails<MyStruct>('structured-flag', { text: 'N/A', percentage: 75 }, evaluationContext, options);
Condition 1.4.2
The implementation uses the static-context paradigm.
Conditional Requirement 1.4.2.1
The
client
MUST provide methods for detailed flag value evaluation with parametersflag key
(string, required),default value
(boolean | number | string | structure, required), andevaluation options
(optional), which returns anevaluation details
structure.
// example detailed boolean flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<boolean> myBoolDetails = client.getBooleanDetails('bool-flag', false);
// example detailed string flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<string> myStringDetails = client.getStringDetails('string-flag', 'N/A', options);
// example detailed number flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<number> myNumberDetails = client.getNumberDetails('number-flag', 75);
// example detailed structure flag evaluation
FlagEvaluationDetails<MyStruct> myStructDetails = client.getObjectDetails<MyStruct>('structured-flag', { text: 'N/A', percentage: 75 }, options);
Requirement 1.4.3
The
evaluation details
structure'svalue
field MUST contain the evaluated flag value.
Condition 1.4.4
The language supports generics (or an equivalent feature).
Conditional Requirement 1.4.4.1
The
evaluation details
structure SHOULD accept a generic argument (or use an equivalent language feature) which indicates the type of the wrappedvalue
field.
Requirement 1.4.5
The
evaluation details
structure'sflag key
field MUST contain theflag key
argument passed to the detailed flag evaluation method.
Requirement 1.4.6
In cases of normal execution, the
evaluation details
structure'svariant
field MUST contain the value of thevariant
field in theflag resolution
structure returned by the configuredprovider
, if the field is set.
Requirement 1.4.7
In cases of normal execution, the
evaluation details
structure'sreason
field MUST contain the value of thereason
field in theflag resolution
structure returned by the configuredprovider
, if the field is set.
Requirement 1.4.8
In cases of abnormal execution, the
evaluation details
structure'serror code
field MUST contain anerror code
.
See error code for details.
Requirement 1.4.9
In cases of abnormal execution (network failure, unhandled error, etc) the
reason
field in theevaluation details
SHOULD indicate an error.
Requirement 1.4.10
Methods, functions, or operations on the client MUST NOT throw exceptions, or otherwise abnormally terminate. Flag evaluation calls must always return the
default value
in the event of abnormal execution. Exceptions include functions or methods for the purposes for configuration or setup.
Configuration code includes code to set the provider, instantiate providers, and configure the global API object.
Requirement 1.4.11
In the case of abnormal execution, the client SHOULD log an informative error message.
Implementations may define a standard logging interface that can be supplied as an optional argument to the client creation function, which may wrap standard logging functionality of the implementation language.
Requirement 1.4.12
The
client
SHOULD provide asynchronous or non-blocking mechanisms for flag evaluation.
It's recommended to provide non-blocking mechanisms for flag evaluation, particularly in languages or environments wherein there's a single thread of execution.
Requirement 1.4.13
In cases of abnormal execution, the
evaluation details
structure'serror message
field MAY contain a string containing additional details about the nature of the error.
Requirement 1.4.14
If the
flag metadata
field in theflag resolution
structure returned by the configuredprovider
is set, theevaluation details
structure'sflag metadata
field MUST contain that value. Otherwise, it MUST contain an empty record.
This flag metadata
field is intended as a mechanism for providers to surface additional information about a feature flag (or its evaluation) beyond what is defined within the OpenFeature spec itself. The primary consumer of this information is a provider-specific hook.
Condition 1.4.15
The implementation language supports a mechanism for marking data as immutable.
Conditional Requirement 1.4.14.1
Condition:
Flag metadata
MUST be immutable.
Evaluation Options
Requirement 1.5.1
The
evaluation options
structure'shooks
field denotes an ordered collection of hooks that the client MUST execute for the respective flag evaluation, in addition to those already configured.
See hooks for details.
1.6. Shutdown
Requirement 1.6.1
The API MUST define a mechanism to propagate a shutdown request to active providers.
The global API object might expose a shutdown
function, which will call the respective shutdown
function on the registered providers.
Alternatively, implementations might leverage language idioms such as auto-disposable interfaces or some means of cancellation signal propagation to allow for graceful shutdown.
see: shutdown
1.7. Provider Lifecycle Management
The implementation maintains an internal representation of the state of configured providers, tracking the lifecycle of each provider.
This state of the provider is exposed on associated clients
.
The diagram below illustrates the possible states and transitions of the state
field for a provider during the provider lifecycle.
* transitions occurring when associated events are spontaneously emitted from the provider
█ only defined in static-context (client-side) paradigm
Note
Only SDKs implementing the static context (client-side) paradigm define RECONCILING
to facilitate context reconciliation.
Requirement 1.7.1
The
client
MUST define aprovider status
accessor which indicates the readiness of the associated provider, with possible valuesNOT_READY
,READY
,STALE
,ERROR
, orFATAL
.
The SDK at all times maintains an up-to-date state corresponding to the success/failure of the last lifecycle method (initialize
, shutdown
, on context change
) or emitted event.
see provider status
Condition 1.7.2
The implementation uses the static-context paradigm.
Conditional Requirement 1.7.2.1
In addition to
NOT_READY
,READY
,STALE
, orERROR
, theprovider status
accessor must support possible valueRECONCILING
.
In the static context paradigm, the implementation must define a provider status
indicating that a provider is reconciling its internal state due to a context change.
Requirement 1.7.3
The client's
provider status
accessor MUST indicateREADY
if theinitialize
function of the associated provider terminates normally.
Once the provider has initialized, the provider status
should indicate the provider is ready to be used to evaluate flags.
Requirement 1.7.4
The client's
provider status
accessor MUST indicateERROR
if theinitialize
function of the associated provider terminates abnormally.
If the provider has failed to initialize, the provider status
should indicate the provider is in an error state.
Requirement 1.7.5
The client's
provider status
accessor MUST indicateFATAL
if theinitialize
function of the associated provider terminates abnormally and indicateserror code
PROVIDER_FATAL
.
If the provider has failed to initialize, the provider status
should indicate the provider is in an error state.
Requirement 1.7.6
The client MUST default, run error hooks, and indicate an error if flag resolution is attempted while the provider is in
NOT_READY
.
The client defaults and returns the PROVIDER_NOT_READY
error code
if evaluation is attempted before the provider is initialized (the provider is still in a NOT_READY
state).
The SDK avoids calling the provider's resolver functions entirely ("short-circuits") if the provider is in this state.
see: error codes, flag value resolution
Requirement 1.7.7
The client MUST default, run error hooks, and indicate an error if flag resolution is attempted while the provider is in
FATAL
.
The client defaults and returns the PROVIDER_FATAL
error code
if evaluation is attempted after the provider has transitioned to an irrecoverable error state.
The SDK avoids calling the provider's resolver functions entirely ("short-circuits") if the provider is in this state.
see: error codes, flag value resolution
Requirement 1.7.8
Implementations SHOULD propagate the
error code
returned from any provider lifecycle methods.
The SDK ensures that if the provider's lifecycle methods terminate with an error code
, that error code is included in any associated error events and returned/thrown errors/exceptions.
see: error codes